Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(380)
-
▼
November
(38)
- Against attribution rights
- Chiasmus of the day
- "Vista capable": capable of confusion?
- Fashion photos: despite brawl, copyright belongs t...
- Harder, better, faster, cover.
- There's just no way to make "chicken by-products" ...
- Giving thanks to the Consumer Law & Policy Blog
- Deceptive advertising case leads to aggressive adv...
- Nip/Sucker: Reality TV as advertising
- Mixed ruling for chiropractors against insurers
- Radio nowhere: no duty to investigate program spon...
- More trademark than trademark
- The cost of gas is the price of standing
- Comcast sued for blocking Bittorrent
- Lululemon: a lulu of a story
- Summer funding for law students
- Haute Diggity affirmed
- breaking news: Fourth Circuit affirms in Haute Dig...
- Google knows, but it doesn't understand
- Beyond mashups as parody
- Suppressing information to protect consumers
- Michigan Telecom & Tech Law Review Blog
- Sampling and clearance culture
- Prince and the new power lawsuit
- Battle of the Pitbulls ends in damages
- Authorship, authenticity, advertising
- Suing your fans: not just for conglomerates anymore
- Google Books blogs
- Moral challenges of user-generated content
- Didn't lose weight, but did lose a lawsuit
- Recent press: Hearsay culture
- Broadcast your school
- Authorization and integrity
- Monkey business on a sunny afternoon
- Filters and fair use
- Candyland everybody wants
- Castles in the air: magnetic toys' performance in ...
- Organicide
-
▼
November
(38)
Labels
- 1201 (18)
- 1202 (1)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (920)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1635)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (156)
- dastar (189)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3023)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (4)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (269)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (100)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (80)
- trademark (2015)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment